The Theory of Motion and the Information Loss Paradox: A Final Perspective

Mehmet Çifçi, with collaborative work via Gemini.

Introduction: This document presents the final solution to the Information Loss Paradox offered by the Theory of Motion, framed within its most honest and lean philosophical perspective. This solution resolves the paradox by reframing the concept of information, stripping it of its human-centric 'importance' and treating it as an inevitable consequence of the fundamental laws of motion.

1. Redefining Information: A Pattern, Not a Meaning

Before resolving the paradox, we must first strip the concept of "information" of its romanticized interpretations. In this final interpretation of our theory, information is not "the sacred record of an experience."

Information is the measurable structural order that a "form" possesses. Nothing more.

It is a map of the temporary configuration of motion at a given moment. The pattern of a crystal contains more structural order (information) than the disordered pattern of a gas. This pattern has no intrinsic 'importance' to the absolute motion of the "öz"; it is merely a reflection of the state at that instant.

2. The Process: Form is Destroyed, the Laws of Motion Remain

When an object falls into a black hole, its "form" (its structural order) is destroyed. However, the fundamental "öz" motion that constituted that form continues to exist, in accordance with basic principles like the conservation of energy. Its state is merged with the internal state of the black hole.

The key point is this: The paradox arises from the idea that "information" is lost. But the real question is: Does the universe have an obligation to preserve a "pattern," and if so, why?

3. The Solution: Purposeless but Inevitable Conservation

The honest solution offered by the Theory of Motion is that the conservation of information is not a purpose, but a consequence.

Information is conserved, but not because it is "sacred" or "important." Information is conserved because **the fundamental law of motion, Quantum Mechanics, is, by its very nature, mathematically reversible**.

This principle of "unitarity" states that if a system evolves from state A (black hole + book) to state B (only radiation), then it must be possible, in principle, to reverse the process and get from B back to A. If information (the pattern of the book) were truly destroyed, you could not rewind the film because you wouldn't know which frame was missing. This would violate the fundamental laws of physics.

The universe does not conserve information because it "wants to save" it. It conserves it because the nature of motion allows for no other option.

The information is encoded in the incredibly complex correlations between the particles of Hawking radiation, spread out over billions of years. It persists there, not because it is meaningful, but because it is mandatory.

Final Thought

The Information Loss Paradox becomes a paradox only when we assign a human-centric 'importance' to information. When we remove that importance, what remains is a fundamental conservation law. This is to accept that the universe is not a library that collects memories, but a causal machine that abides by the fundamental laws of motion without exception. Information is not lost, because the machine's operation does not allow for it. That is all.

This page is part of the living architecture of Nowonacra: The Flux.
To go deeper, see the full technical paper:

MOTION THEORY (Full Text)