The Theory of Motion and Manifesto: A Final Perspective on the Fine-Tuning Problem
Introduction: Modern physics is confronted with the question of why our universe is fine-tuned to allow life. This text argues, using the axioms of the Theory of Motion, that the question itself is a matter of perspective and offers a final philosophical resolution.
1. The Wrong Question: "Why Fine-Tuning?"
The problem arises from a finite human perspective. Concepts like "purpose," "reason," and "significance" are meaningful only to beings who are mortal. That which is absolute and eternal needs no purpose—it simply is.
The universe we experience—with its colors, solidity, and laws—is merely a shadow of the absolute "essence's" motion. We are staring at the shape of a shadow on a wall and asking, "Why is this shadow so perfectly aligned with the wall?" But the real question should be about the nature of the object casting the shadow. The fine-tuning problem is a misperception, confusing the shadow for the real object.
2. Rejection of Human-Centered Answers
The standard responses to this problem suffer from this fundamental misperception:
- Anthropic Principle: "The universe is fine-tuned for us because we are here." This presumes our temporary form is central and important.
- Multiverse Theories: "There are infinite universes; we are in the lucky one." Again, this seeks to validate our fortunate existence.
Both approaches contradict the philosophy of the Theory of Motion. They are "words spoken to preserve the transient." Both assume our form holds ultimate importance. Yet the Theory of Motion begins with the assertion that no form is absolute.
3. The Real Answer: One Law, Infinite Manifestations
If constants weren't fine-tuned, why do they have the values they do?
The answer is simple: because they have no other possibility. They are the inevitable consequences of a more fundamental, singular law.
"They possess an absolute law. This is the law of being. It is superior to all other laws. The rest are its manifestations."
Constants like the speed of light ($c$), Planck constant ($\hbar$), or parameters in our potential ($\mu, \lambda$) are not "tuned" but are necessary geometric and dynamic projections of the essence's absolute motion. Just as the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter ($\pi$) is not fine-tuned, but a consequence of being a circle. So too are our universe's constants natural outcomes of the nature of absolute motion.
Final Thought
The fine-tuning problem is not one of probability or luck—it is a matter of perspective. The Theory of Motion solves this by asserting that the universe is not a random formation but a "shadow" cast by a fundamental, absolute motion. It exists not because it is meaningful or purposeful but because the underlying law allows for no alternative.
This page is part of the living architecture of Nowonacra: The Flux.
To go deeper, see the full technical paper: